Re: Is Oracle deliberately difficult?

From: <chriss_at_enteract.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2000 07:19:30 GMT
Message-ID: <8ofo5n$d8l$1@nnrp1.deja.com>

Though your post was somewhat humorous, the guy asked a legit question. As somone who is learning Oracle right now - it seems a lot of the way things are done are from circa 20 years ago (as pointed out) and fails to take advantage of technologies that can speed and ease the use and administration.

just my $.02

In article <WYBq5.912$dD4.75144_at_monger.newsread.com>, "Van Messner" <vmessner_at_bestweb.net> wrote:
> I'm sure that it is. Outside Kansas City where Oracle has its
difficulty
> office there are two subdivisions - one for deliberate and one for
> accidental. Both divisions have been fully staffed for many years,
but
> there are about three times as many people in the deliberate division.
>
> Van
>
> "Sid_James" <sid.james_at_virgin.net> wrote in message
> news:39AAD6A9.5540_at_virgin.net...
> > I've been learning Oracle for a while now and I do think of it as
quite
> > challenging in an enjoyable way. I don't use Enterprise Manager, I'd
> > rather get to to know the 'nuts and bolts'. However, having done a
SQL
> > Server administrator's course, I can't help thinking that Oracle is
> > rather more difficult to use than maybe it should be.
> >
> > Sensible, rational responses that shoot me up in flames are always
> > preferable!
> >
> > e d
>
>

Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy. Received on Tue Aug 29 2000 - 02:19:30 CDT