Ditto. Although way back in A2.0 days, there was a big tech article about
it, and that is where I first heard of it and started to use the deployment
method of file server vs one standalone app.
--
Pete B
David W. Fenton <dXXXfenton_at_bway.net> wrote in message
news:8F7EDADE4dfentonbwaynet_at_news1.bway.net...
> barnesp_at_datatek.com (Pete B) wrote in
> <so0joo533j161_at_news.supernews.com>:
>
> >Apparently, he thinks splitting the app into a data file and an
> >interface file is merely an exercise in creating Access mdb files
> >that we developers do for fun. Amazing that a person involved
> >with scientific work would not immediately have the obvious
> >question come to mind, "WHY would I want to do this, what is the
> >**advantage** in doing so?"
>
> Am I wrong, but hasn't the split architecture been recommended in
> the help files for multi-user apps since Access 2?
>
> Once again, people don't read the help files.
>
> That's the only way *I* ever would have figured out to split the
> files, since I certainly was teaching myself Access 2 by creating
> applications, as I went along. And all my apps, ever, have used the
> split architecture. I didn't figure it out on my own -- it came
> from the Access documentation itself.
>
> --
> David W. Fenton http://www.bway.net/~dfenton
> dfenton at bway dot net http://www.bway.net/~dfassoc
>
>
Received on Fri Jul 28 2000 - 00:00:00 CDT
