Re: Does anyone have serious databases on NT?

From: <cpereyra_at_ix.netcom.com>
Date: Thu, 05 Aug 1999 00:45:47 GMT
Message-ID: <7oamrn$a7v$1@nnrp1.deja.com>

The response to the question "Does anyone have serious databases on NT?"

Yes. Microsoft.

In article <37a18698.4811097_at_news.supernews.com>, mkx_at_excite.com wrote:
> After reading many, many articles, press releases, and marketing
> propaganda about the fight for the dominant position on NT, I seem to
> see something missing: Any direct evidence that anyone is using the
> major databases on NT (other than Microsoft's SQL Server). Most
> serious (non-mainframe) projects always seem to go on Unix, AS/400,
> etc. I understand why this is - many organizations are hesitant to go
> "Enterprise on NT".
>
> All of the statistics I have seen wrap the UNIX/NT market segments
> together. Thus the "leader in license revenue" may have gotten there
> on UNIX, without selling that much on NT.
>
> I simply am interested in seeing where the major work is being done on
> NT specifically, and if it is done elsewhere than MS SQL.
>
>

Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Share what you know. Learn what you don't. Received on Wed Aug 04 1999 - 19:45:47 CDT