Re: COBOL Oracle

From: Matthew Son <esmks_at_email.ais.unc.edu>
Date: Wed, 28 Apr 1999 10:54:56 -0400
Message-ID: <37272140.B940911E@email.ais.unc.edu>

Thanks for your help.

The definitions appear to be the same as DB2 definitions. The correct picture for the IBM 3090 was

01 var1 pic s9(2) comp-3.

Matt

J Thompson wrote:
>
> my understanding, using MicroFocus's NetExpress software is
>
> 01 VAR1 PIC9(2) comp-5
>
> Is it potentially different across the other vendors?
>
> Matthew Son wrote in message <371B816F.831AF1B_at_email.ais.unc.edu>...
> >Can someone tell me how you define a picture clause for a numeric
> >variable from an Oracle database in COBOL?
> >
> >01 VAR1 PIC 9(2). does not work.
> >
> >Thanks in Advance,
> >
> >Matt
Received on Wed Apr 28 1999 - 09:54:56 CDT