Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.misc -> Re: DB_FILE_MULTIBLOCK_READ_COUNT

Re: DB_FILE_MULTIBLOCK_READ_COUNT

From: <satar_at_my-dejanews.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 1998 22:13:46 GMT
Message-ID: <7184uq$ip4$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com>


I'm not using Peoplesoft, but it does make sense to adjust that parameter to a smaller number on OLTP.

Good Luck,
Satar

In article <36350165.2E9C_at_concentric.net>,   alucus_at_concentric.net wrote:
> I have a PeopleSoft application running on Oracle 7.2 and NT 3.51.
>
> I have a very low hit ratio and have been playing around with increasing
> the DB_BLOCK_BUFFERS by using the DB_BLOCK_LRU_EXTENDED_STATISTICS
> method, but the expansion of the DB_BLOCK_BUFFERS seems to have little
> or no effect on the hit ratio.
>
> I also have determined we have no free blocks by querying the actual
> blocks and their status and have no free blocks. All appear read and
> altered.
>
> My next step is to look into the DB_FILE_MULTIBLOCK_READ_COUNT value.
> We have a 2K blocksize and our multiblock read count is set to 32. I
> think this may be a hog on my hit ratio as the application is primarily
> a OLTP application. I want to drop this, but want someone to verify my
> logic in doing so. Has anyone ever run into this hit ratio problem when
> running PeopleSoft HRMS?
>
> Thanks for any help or advice you could offer.
> --
> ===================================================================
> \\||// A fool and his money are soon partying
> / \
> []--[] Allen Lucas
> @ /\ @ Chicago Bridge & Iron
> {----} Plainfield, Il 60544
> ^^ alucus_at_concentric.net
> ===================================================================
>

--
Oracle DBA/UNIX System Admin
Advanced Enterprise Solutions
(949) 756-0588
Oracle Re-Seller

-----------== Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ==---------- http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own Received on Wed Oct 28 1998 - 16:13:46 CST

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US