Re: how to link different but related tables
From: Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex_at_attglobal.net>
Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2016 11:05:27 -0400
Message-ID: <nc985k$f54$2_at_jstuckle.eternal-september.org>
> I am afraid to have to inform you, that in the 12 years or so I have
> been lurking posting and reading in this group. Jerry Stuckle has on
> many occasions criticised many many posters, but he has never ever
> posted a single line of SQL, or made a single helpful comment that
> amounted to more than 'read the manual'
>
> Jerry isn't here to help. Well not you: himself? maybe. He is - a man
> with 'issues'.
>
>
Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2016 11:05:27 -0400
Message-ID: <nc985k$f54$2_at_jstuckle.eternal-september.org>
On 3/15/2016 9:52 AM, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
> On 15/03/16 13:32, mireero wrote:
>
>> >> _at_Jerry: >> "terrible" is quite a strong word, what would you propose? >> "Normalizing", I got that, but how exactly? >> >> Thanks guys
> I am afraid to have to inform you, that in the 12 years or so I have
> been lurking posting and reading in this group. Jerry Stuckle has on
> many occasions criticised many many posters, but he has never ever
> posted a single line of SQL, or made a single helpful comment that
> amounted to more than 'read the manual'
>
> Jerry isn't here to help. Well not you: himself? maybe. He is - a man
> with 'issues'.
>
>
ROFLMAO! Another provable lie by the out of work ditch digger. It's no wonder you won't use your real name. I'd use a pseudonym if I were as stoopid as you are, too.
Go back, learn which end of the shovel you use, and maybe you can find another job.
-- ================== Remove the "x" from my email address Jerry Stuckle jstucklex_at_attglobal.net ==================Received on Tue Mar 15 2016 - 16:05:27 CET