Re: Parallel Query Performance Issues

From: Andy Sayer <andysayer_at_gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2022 12:34:09 +0100
Message-ID: <CACj1VR7MZFRZSFF3=TUdrUB_MgmsPxXmR8bsKrxvg8FKm+CQdg_at_mail.gmail.com>



Hi Goti,

You’ve linked the same monitor report twice, I think we’re missing the slower '2019'

Thanks,
Andy

On Thu, 9 Jun 2022 at 12:15, Goti <aryan.goti_at_gmail.com> wrote:

> Environment : 11.2.0.4 database running on Linux.
>
> Need help to understand parallel query performance issues. Below are the
> query details and its associated plans. The 2018_query does execute in 24
> seconds and returns about 2.5K rows. The 2019_query is also expected to
> process almost the same number of rows however it consumes a lot of TEMP
> space and finally fails. The 2019_query without parallel completes in 45
> minutes (Just by removing the parallel hint). The only difference between
> both the queries is related to the predicate "opclf.year_number =
> to_number('YYYY')". The stats are up to date for the tables are partitions.
>
>
> 2019_query:
> https://gist.github.com/aryangoti/a7704a8075f118f7d942e49acee1900d
>
> 2018_query:
> https://gist.github.com/aryangoti/a7704a8075f118f7d942e49acee1900d
>
> Stats and other details:
> https://gist.github.com/aryangoti/a3797424ce0cb4fd87e194c05ad099b6
>
> Thanks,
>
> Goti
>

--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Received on Thu Jun 09 2022 - 13:34:09 CEST

Original text of this message