Re: Create common user in all PDB's

From: Martin Berger <martin.a.berger_at_gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2022 07:24:03 +0100
Message-ID: <CALH8A92MCUiFzF1UaCTrCTS+iV3UGVXU+kdVd5b4faOSL1HAKQ_at_mail.gmail.com>



Hi Jacques,

is this still an issue?
can you check if CONTAINER_PARALLEL_LIMIT is set? I can't promise it will help, but at least it somehow limits some container-wide activities.

br,
 Martin

Am Fr., 4. Feb. 2022 um 19:09 Uhr schrieb Google <jacques.kostic_at_gmail.com>:

> Hi John
>
> I'm also an Oracle employee, neither in a support org nor in a role that
>> relates directly to the internals of technologies discussed in this
>> thread. Opinions are my own, I don't represent Oracle here, etc, etc.
>>
>> It''s an interesting case that I liked to share.
>> There is an SR and the problem will probably be solved.
>>
>> Cheers
>> Jko
>>
>>
>> On February 4, 2022 18:59:58 John Piwowar <jpiwowar_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Starting with a disclaimer: I'm an Oracle employee, but neither in a
>> support org nor in a role that relates directly to the internals of
>> technologies discussed in this thread. Opinions are my own, I don't
>> represent Oracle here, etc, etc. This is basically what I would've said in
>> my consulting days, anyway:
>>
>> First, I strongly recommend logging an SR for this. A huge number of
>> PDBs in a single CDB is *unusual, *but it's not unique*. *You certainly
>> appear to be bumping up against a scale issue with the patch process, and
>> if so you're unlikely to be the only customer to do so. There may be a
>> solution already, or if it's actively being worked on, you can at least be
>> added to any existing bugs to be notified of a solution.
>>
>> Second, as you've suggested (and the ORA-12805 errors reinforce), there
>> are a lot of data dictionary operations that are parallelized when executed
>> from the CDB$ROOT level; you *might* be running into that here. You can
>> also probably see the PQ operations heavily represented in AWR/ASH
>> reports. You may get better results by throttling the PQ settings in your
>> environment during the patch process...where "better" is "At least the
>> server doesn't fall down." :) That's only a guess...I don't have that kind
>> of environment available to conduct experiments.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> John P.
>>
>> On Fri, Feb 4, 2022 at 7:23 AM jacques kostic <jacques.kostic_at_gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi there,
>>>
>>> Here is a nice one:
>>>
>>> Customer is under Exadata CS, 2 nodes with 10 cores in each node.
>>> He has a CDB with more than 2'500 PDB's.
>>>
>>> He needs to patch the Exadata CS tooling and during the patching a
>>> common user is created into all PDB's.
>>> At this point, the CPU goes bananas and the process stops with ORA-12805
>>> (os related)
>>> The system is just overloaded!
>>>
>>> Am I wrong to say that this Create common user goes in // on all PDB
>>> when add container=all?
>>>
>>> We could split the process and proceed by chunks but of course we cannot
>>> touch the patching scripts...
>>>
>>> Any way to avoid this // create common user processing?
>>>
>>> Cheers
>>> jko
>>>
>>>
>

-- 
Martin Berger                Oracle ♠
martin.a.berger_at_gmail.com _at_martinberx <https://twitter.com/martinberx>
^∆x      http://berxblog.blogspot.com

--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Received on Tue Feb 15 2022 - 07:24:03 CET

Original text of this message