gv$active_session_history.blocking_session

From: Noveljic Nenad <nenad.noveljic_at_vontobel.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2019 09:35:46 +0000
Message-ID: <105502_1560245755_5CFF75FB_105502_83_1_4739acfec7e743bb896878840069198b_at_vontobel.com>



The session 2231 had 49 samples in the observed time period:

select event,blocking_session,count(*)
  from gv$active_session_history where session_id = 2231     and sample_time between

      to_date('11.06.2019 07:08:30','dd.mm.yyyy hh24:mi:ss') and
      to_date('11.06.2019 07:09:20','dd.mm.yyyy hh24:mi:ss')
  group by event,blocking_session order by count(*) desc
;

EVENT



BLOCKING_SESSION COUNT(*)
---------------- ----------
log file switch (private strand flush incomplete)
             736         49

As we can see, the session was solely waiting on "log file switch (private strand flush incomplete)" and was blocked by the session 736.

But, only 12 samples were captured for the blocker during the same time period:

select count(*)
  from gv$active_session_history where session_id = 736     and sample_time between

      to_date('11.06.2019 07:08:30','dd.mm.yyyy hh24:mi:ss') and
      to_date('11.06.2019 07:09:20','dd.mm.yyyy hh24:mi:ss')

;

  COUNT(*)


        12

I'd like to offer some possible explanations for the blocker's "missing" entries:

1. The session 2231 was indeed blocked by the session 736, but the session 736 was for the big part inactive.
2. The blocking_session information was obsolete when the sample was taken.
3. The blocker was active, but not sampled.

Interestingly, Tanel's ash_wait_chains.sql seems to operate under the assumption 2, as only 24% ( round(12/49)*100 ) of the time the session appears to be blocked:

SQL> _at_ash_wait_chains session_id||':'||event2 "session_id=2231" "to_date('11.06.2019 07:08:00','dd.mm.yyyy hh24:mi:ss')" "to_date('11.06.2019 07:09:20','dd.mm.yyyy hh24:mi:ss')"

  • Display ASH Wait Chain Signatures script v0.2 BETA by Tanel Poder ( http://blog.tanelpoder.com ) old 22: AND sample_time BETWEEN &3 AND &4 new 22: AND sample_time BETWEEN to_date('11.06.2019 07:08:00','dd.mm.yyyy hh24:mi:ss') AND to_date('11.06.2019 07:09:20','dd.mm.yyyy hh24:mi:ss') old 31: --, SYS_CONNECT_BY_PATH(&1, ' -> ')||CASE WHEN CONNECT_BY_ISLEAF = 1 THEN '('||d.session_id||')' ELSE NULL END path new 31: --, SYS_CONNECT_BY_PATH(session_id||':'||event2, ' -> ')||CASE WHEN CONNECT_BY_ISLEAF = 1 THEN '('||d.session_id||')' ELSE NULL END path old 32: , REPLACE(SYS_CONNECT_BY_PATH(&1, '->'), '->', ' -> ') path -- there's a reason why I'm doing this (ORA-30004 :) new 32: , REPLACE(SYS_CONNECT_BY_PATH(session_id||':'||event2, '->'), '->', ' -> ') path -- there's a reason why I'm doing this (ORA-30004 :) old 42: AND d.sample_time BETWEEN &3 AND &4 new 42: AND d.sample_time BETWEEN to_date('11.06.2019 07:08:00','dd.mm.yyyy hh24:mi:ss') AND to_date('11.06.2019 07:09:20','dd.mm.yyyy hh24:mi:ss') old 48: START WITH &2 new 48: START WITH session_id=2231 old 54: , ROUND(COUNT(*) / ((CAST(&4 AS DATE) - CAST(&3 AS DATE)) * 86400), 1) AAS new 54: , ROUND(COUNT(*) / ((CAST(to_date('11.06.2019 07:09:20','dd.mm.yyyy hh24:mi:ss') AS DATE) - CAST(to_date('11.06.2019 07:08:00','dd.mm.yyyy hh24:mi:ss') AS DATE)) * 86400), 1) AAS old 64: &1 new 64: session_id||':'||event2

%This SECONDS AAS
------ ---------- ----------
WAIT_CHAIN



  76% 37 .5
-> 2231:log file switch (private strand flush incomplete)

  16% 8 .1
-> 2231:log file switch (private strand flush incomplete) -> 736:enq: CF - contention -> 757:db file single write

   4% 2 0
-> 2231:log file switch (private strand flush incomplete) -> 736:control file

%This SECONDS AAS
------ ---------- ----------
WAIT_CHAIN



sequential read

   2% 1 0
-> 2231:log file switch (private strand flush incomplete) -> 736:ON CPU

   2% 1 0
-> 2231:log file switch (private strand flush incomplete) -> 736:LGWR all worker groups

My question are:

1. Was the session 2231 really blocked by 736 the whole time?
2. If yes, why the samples from 736 are missing?
3. If no, when does blocking_session get cleared?

Best regards,

Nenad

https://nenadnoveljic.com/blog/



Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail. Bitte denken Sie an die Umwelt, bevor Sie dieses E-Mail drucken.
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<style type="text/css">p { font-family: Arial;font-size:9pt }</style>
</head>
<body>
<p>
<br>Important Notice</br>
<br />

This message is intended only for the individual named. It may contain confidential or privileged information. If you are not the named addressee you should in particular not disseminate, distribute, modify or copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender immediately by e-mail, if you have received this message by mistake and delete it from your system.<br /> Without prejudice to any contractual agreements between you and us which shall prevail in any case, we take it as your authorization to correspond with you by e-mail if you send us messages by e-mail. However, we reserve the right not to execute orders and instructions transmitted by e-mail at any time and without further explanation.<br /> E-mail transmission may not be secure or error-free as information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive late or incomplete. Also processing of incoming e-mails cannot be guaranteed. All liability of Vontobel Holding Ltd. and any of its affiliates (hereinafter collectively referred to as "Vontobel Group") for any damages resulting from e-mail use is excluded. You are advised that urgent and time sensitive messages should not be sent by e-mail and if verification is required please request a printed version.</br> Please note that all e-mail communications to and from the Vontobel Group are subject to electronic storage and review by Vontobel Group. Unless stated to the contrary and without prejudice to any contractual agreements between you and Vontobel Group which shall prevail in any case, e-mail-communication is for informational purposes only and is not intended as an offer or solicitation for the purchase or sale of any financial instrument or as an official confirmation of any transaction.<br /> The legal basis for the processing of your personal data is the legitimate interest to develop a commercial relationship with you, as well as your consent to forward you commercial communications. You can exercise, at any time and under the terms established under current regulation, your rights. If you prefer not to receive any further communications, please contact your client relationship manager if you are a client of Vontobel Group or notify the sender. Please note for an exact reference to the affected group entity the corporate e-mail signature. For further information about data privacy at Vontobel Group please consult <a href="https://www.vontobel.com">www.vontobel.com</a>.<br />
</p>
</body>
</html>


--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Received on Tue Jun 11 2019 - 11:35:46 CEST

Original text of this message