Re: inside Oracle database development
Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2018 09:48:00 -0800
Message-ID: <79cd0e28-b82d-7f1b-3414-1eff32b6e3d6_at_gmail.com>
I recall a verbal version of this exact conversation in the early 1990s,
like 1991 or 1992 or so. I recall the person only mentioned 10 million
lines and, as he had several people besides me listening, he concluded
with "it's a miracle it works at all" and basically assured anyone using
Oracle they were soon to die horribly.
Every time someone complains about "bad coding", I cringe if they're
complaining about style or appearance or programming language or some
other aesthetic. The only true criteria that matters is "does it work",
because programming is very biological. Good code works. Bad code
doesn't. Really good code works for decades. Things are added, things
die and fall away, things are repaired, things compete, and above all
things evolve. In case you haven't dissected anything lately, biology
is not always aesthetically pleasing, but whether it is or not, it needs
to work.
On 11/16/18 08:56, Chris Stephens wrote:
> agree on #1.
>
> not sure i agree with the full sentiment of #2. :)
>
> On Fri, Nov 16, 2018 at 10:40 AM Ric Van Dyke <ric.van.dyke_at_hotsos.com
> <mailto:ric.van.dyke_at_hotsos.com>> wrote:
>
> Having worked there also, I have two conclusions about the Oracle
> Database:
>
> 1. It’s miracle it works at all. (As the author says)
>
> 2. It’s even more impressive that it works so amazingly well!
>
> *From:*oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org
> <mailto:oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org>
> [mailto:oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org
> <mailto:oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org>] *On Behalf Of *Chris Stephens
> *Sent:* Friday, November 16, 2018 10:12 AM
> *To:* oracle-l
> *Subject:* inside Oracle database development
>
> https://news.ycombinator.com/threads?id=oraguy
>
> too interesting and relevant to not post.
>
> sounds like a nightmare.
>
-- http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-lReceived on Fri Nov 16 2018 - 18:48:00 CET