Re: utl_file question

From: Hans Forbrich <fuzzy.graybeard_at_gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2018 07:57:29 -0600
Message-ID: <6ae6fede-8b82-3c34-e58e-f69e1daf2a33_at_gmail.com>



Sounds like the DIRECTORY_OBJECT (the object stored in the DB data dictionary that replaces the PATH in old versions of the DB) may not be correct, or permissions to the DIRECTORY_OBJECT may not have been GRANTED to the user running utl_file.

/Hans
Note: I work for Oracle.  Opinions are my own, not my employers.

On 2018-06-20 7:31 AM, Storey, Robert (DCSO) wrote:
>
> Working on moving some stored procedures from a 9i to an 11g system
> and I hit a snag with regards to utl_file.
>
> In my stored proc, I pull a path variable, ie, d:\level1\level2 for a
> root level folder.  Then, as the procedure goes through the motions,
> it tacks on another level to this path based on some criteria.  It
> then writes out a flat text file to location d:\Level1\Level2\Level3.
>
> When I tested this proc in my 11g, I kept getting an
> utl_file.invalid_path error.   I first took this as permissions based,
> but, when I gave everyone full control of the destination folder, it
> still gave same error.
>
> Created a simple proc to just open and close a file.  Get the same
> error regardless of where I point it.  This code works perfect on the
> 9i, but not 11g.
>
> A check of documents and online searching seems to point to the fact
> that you can’t pass UTL_FILE.FOPEN a qualified path name.  You now
> have to create a “Directory” object and give permssions to it, and use
> it as the Path.
>
> Anyone confirm or deny?
>

--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Received on Wed Jun 20 2018 - 15:57:29 CEST

Original text of this message