Re: Anyone know any WP which explains about FTS vs Index Scan?

From: Tony <dedba_at_tpg.com.au>
Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2018 10:37:06 +1000
Message-ID: <F56B7D48-55F5-46CE-9CE2-5D5DC70D2770_at_tpg.com.au>



That is gold! Thanks for lightening up my morning.

Cheers
Tony

On 15 April 2018 5:03:51 am AEST, Mladen Gogala <gogala.mladen_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>That is, as far as I remember, the 11th commandment on the tablets
>handed to Moses on Mt. Sinai:
>
>"Thou shalt always use index range scan"
>
>In the beginning, there was a rule base optimizer, which used a ranked
>list of access methods. The optimizer has always selected the access
>method with the highest rank. Full table scan was at the bottom of the
>list, single row scan by rowid and single row scan by PK were at the
>very top of the list. Hash access methods were not on the list. And God
>
>saw that RBO was good simple. But then the devil has created CBO and
>made a set of complex rules which change from release to release.
>However, it is ordained that faithful should still use RBO principles
>and ignore CBO, statistics and all related devil's handiwork.
>
>
>On 04/14/2018 11:19 AM, Frits Hoogland wrote:
>> My question would be: why an index range scan MUST be used? What is
>> the reason for this person to deem it mandatory?
>
>--
>Mladen Gogala
>Database Consultant
>Tel: (347) 321-1217
>
>--
>http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l

-- 
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Received on Sun Apr 15 2018 - 02:37:06 CEST

Original text of this message