Re: Developers wanting individual Unit Test (no data) databases - suggestions?

From: Chris Taylor <christopherdtaylor1994_at_gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2017 13:11:21 -0500
Message-ID: <CAP79kiQkoSEcyfeaGb93yvxPeEtj97RDZ90kCxvYrkYL_94WTw_at_mail.gmail.com>



Partially would but they're wanting their own individual instances so they can run their tests without checking to see if someone else is already using the environment.

Chris

On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 1:07 PM, Rich J <rjoralist3_at_society.servebeer.com> wrote:

> On 2017/08/11 12:25, Chris Taylor wrote:
>
> We've got a relatively large development group who want to have many Unit
> Test databases (without data) that they can spin up on demand and destroy
> when done.
>
> I'm curious what products are available that could facilitate something
> like this?
>
>
>
> Going in a potentially less-complicated route, couldn't a metadata-only
> datapump over a network link work for this? One could even have an
> on-demand Scheduler job to kick it off.
>
> Just a thought...
>
> Rich
>

--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Received on Mon Aug 14 2017 - 20:11:21 CEST

Original text of this message