RE: HA options

From: Rahul Choubey <choubeyrahul97_at_gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2017 21:44:56 +0530
Message-ID: <CACJRASWXh=PDgfW_AH4FOOjkVBpf2ATfVz7D0vWFAyNMh185Aw_at_mail.gmail.com>



Hi,
  Have you tried the option of far sync.

Thanks & Regards,

Rahul Choubey
+91-8879403896

On 19-Jun-2017 9:24 PM, "Reen, Elizabeth" <dmarc-noreply_at_freelists.org> wrote:

> I agree, but my management seems to be believing all of the
> spin on the cloud. Thanks to all for the suggestions. There isn’t much
> out there, but I can say I covered all of the bases.
>
>
>
>
>
> Liz
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org [mailto:oracle-l-bounce_at_
> freelists.org] *On Behalf Of *Mladen Gogala
> *Sent:* Saturday, June 17, 2017 2:06 PM
> *To:* oracle-l_at_freelists.org
> *Subject:* Re: HA options
>
>
>
> On 06/15/2017 01:08 PM, Reen, Elizabeth (Redacted sender elizabeth.reen
> for DMARC) wrote:
>
> I’m thinking about that, but don’t really see the difference between it
> and dataguard.
>
> The only difference is the price: for fail-over cluster, you don't need
> another instance, which means that your budget will take a much smaller hit.
>
> --
>
> Mladen Gogala
>
> Oracle DBA
>
> Tel: (347) 321-1217
>
>

--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Received on Mon Jun 19 2017 - 18:14:56 CEST

Original text of this message