Re: block chg tracking

From: Jared Still <jkstill_at_gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2015 08:47:54 -0800
Message-ID: <CAORjz=MUWGt35rs15YWERVgSSC+M6X=_fkd3MPuzOMV5VTQxxw_at_mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, Feb 2, 2015 at 2:50 PM, Mladen Gogala <dmarc-noreply_at_freelists.org> wrote:

> The answer is that the increase is not noticeable, but there are bugs with
> respect to "duplicate database" which can prevent you from successfully
> duplicating the database for development. I find backup with de-duplication
> technology, like Commvault Simpana, far preferable to incremental backups.
>

Hi Mladen,

Though dedup reduces the size on the backend, it does nothing for database impact.

As you know BCT reduces the reads on the db by RMAN, so I am a little confused by this statement.

Jared Still
Certifiable Oracle DBA and Part Time Perl Evangelist Principal Consultant at Pythian
Pythian Blog http://www.pythian.com/blog/author/still/ Oracle Blog: http://jkstill.blogspot.com Home Page: http://jaredstill.com

--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l

Received on Sun Feb 15 2015 - 17:47:54 CET