Re: Is filesystemio_options relevant when the database is on ASM ?
From: Hans Forbrich <fuzzy.graybeard_at_gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2014 09:29:32 -0600
Message-ID: <543FE45C.8070409_at_gmail.com>
On 16/10/2014 3:35 AM, Frits Hoogland wrote:
> When using NFS underneath ASM, I've witnessed filesystemio_options
> being honoured by the database, which means it needs setting it to
> 'setall' for the combination AIO+DIO. Which makes sense, because you
> need to create a file on a (NFS) filesystem to be used as ASM disk device.
Then it becomes important to know which NFS?
Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2014 09:29:32 -0600
Message-ID: <543FE45C.8070409_at_gmail.com>
On 16/10/2014 3:35 AM, Frits Hoogland wrote:
> When using NFS underneath ASM, I've witnessed filesystemio_options
> being honoured by the database, which means it needs setting it to
> 'setall' for the combination AIO+DIO. Which makes sense, because you
> need to create a file on a (NFS) filesystem to be used as ASM disk device.
Then it becomes important to know which NFS?
I believe DNFS behaves different than standard NFSv3 which may be different again from NFSv4
/Hans
-- http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-lReceived on Thu Oct 16 2014 - 17:29:32 CEST