RE: % memory in dbca
Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2014 08:24:24 -0400
Message-ID: <01dd01cfa0f0$e280c9c0$a7825d40$_at_rsiz.com>
Also, check what ulimit reports for the account you are using to install oracle. I can’t remember if Oracle considers just the system total or the floor of the system and the account limit.
mwf
From: oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org [mailto:oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org] On Behalf Of Hans Forbrich
Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2014 10:41 AM
To: Oliver
Cc: oracle-l
Subject: Re: % memory in dbca
Personal suggestion would be to try a supported combination to verify that this is indeed a bug. You can get 'supported' versions from Oracle or CentOs to try it out.
If I remember correctly, the kernel memory reporting structures was one area that changed between 2.6.18 and 2.6.32. That could account for the challenge.
/Hans
On 15/07/2014 8:20 AM, Oliver wrote:
I'm sorry. It is red hat enterprise 6.5 64-bit. Oracle software 64-bit too. I know that it isn't supported,I've used -ignoresysprereqs in the installation. Thanks beforehand.
El 15/07/2014 13:57, "Hans Forbrich" <fuzzy.graybeard_at_gmail.com> escribió:
First questions that come to mind:
Which Linux distro & version?
32-bit or 64-bit Linux?
/Hans
On 15/07/2014 5:24 AM, Oliver wrote:
Hi,
I've installed 10201 on a linux server (x86_64), only binaries. I've installed then 10205 patchset and I'm trying create a new database now with dbca.
The problem that I'm seeing is that in the memory section, I'm putting 40% of percentage, it shows correctly total physical memory (64424MB), but when I access to "show memory distribution", it shows that will use 8008 as total memory for Oracle ... 1536MB SGA, 6432MB PGA and oracle process size 40MB.
What's happening? 40% of 64GB isn't 8GB ..
Thanks beforehand.
Cheers...
-- http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l -- http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-lReceived on Wed Jul 16 2014 - 14:24:24 CEST