Re: haip, network interface bonding
From: Lu Jiang <lu.jiang69_at_yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2013 04:54:11 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <1373975651.70646.YahooMailNeo_at_web120001.mail.ne1.yahoo.com>
Thanks Seth.
We are using Linux active/active nic bonding with stacked switches.
Lu
From: Seth Miller <sethmiller.sm_at_gmail.com> To: list <oracle-l_at_freelists.org>
Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2013 11:35 PM
Subject: Re: haip, network interface bonding
Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2013 04:54:11 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <1373975651.70646.YahooMailNeo_at_web120001.mail.ne1.yahoo.com>
Thanks Seth.
We are using Linux active/active nic bonding with stacked switches.
Lu
From: Seth Miller <sethmiller.sm_at_gmail.com> To: list <oracle-l_at_freelists.org>
Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2013 11:35 PM
Subject: Re: haip, network interface bonding
Lu,
A lot of times, bonded nics are configured active/passive. If this is the
case, you are using only one of the nics in the bond. HAIP can be a big
advantage in this case if you eliminate the bond and take advantage of the
full bandwidth of all of the nics for the interconnect.
Seth
On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 9:24 AM, Lu Jiang <lu.jiang69_at_yahoo.com> wrote:
> Hi DBA gurus,
>
> Has anyone configured haip or haip plus network interface bonding for
> Oracle RAC interconnection? Is there any big advantage if compare with
> network interface bonding?
>
> Thanks,
> Lu
> --
> http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
>
>
>
-- http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l -- http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-lReceived on Tue Jul 16 2013 - 13:54:11 CEST