Re: haip, network interface bonding

From: Marcin Przepiorowski <pioro1_at_gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2013 12:50:46 +0100
Message-ID: <CAGdek=zmF20KZ_wtHkVqyif+L3j0LKu8aPenScFMySSLf_ooww_at_mail.gmail.com>

Hi,
In my opinion proper NIC bonding is more complicated to implement and I have seen lot of situation that it cause problem due to configuration error between host and switches.

HAIP is easier to configure.

regards,
Marcin

On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 12:54 PM, Lu Jiang <lu.jiang69_at_yahoo.com> wrote:

> Thanks Seth.
>
> We are using Linux active/active nic bonding with stacked switches.
>
> Lu
>
>
> ________________________________
> From: Seth Miller <sethmiller.sm_at_gmail.com>
> To: list <oracle-l_at_freelists.org>
> Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2013 11:35 PM
> Subject: Re: haip, network interface bonding
>
>
> Lu,
> A lot of times, bonded nics are configured active/passive. If this is the
> case, you are using only one of the nics in the bond. HAIP can be a big
> advantage in this case if you eliminate the bond and take advantage of the
> full bandwidth of all of the nics for the interconnect.
>
> Seth
>
>
> On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 9:24 AM, Lu Jiang <lu.jiang69_at_yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi DBA gurus,
> >
> > Has anyone configured haip or haip plus network interface bonding for
> > Oracle RAC interconnection? Is there any big advantage if compare with
> > network interface bonding?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Lu
> > --
> > http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
> --
> http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
>
>
>

-- 
Marcin Przepiorowski
http://oracleprof.blogspot.com


--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l

Received on Wed Jul 17 2013 - 13:50:46 CEST