Re: Unwanted SQL Developer inverse connection storming
From: Hans Forbrich <fuzzy.graybeard_at_gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 09 Apr 2013 08:32:19 -0600
Message-ID: <51642673.9040005_at_gmail.com>
On 09/04/2013 8:08 AM, Jeff Smith wrote:
> I guess that's where we disagree. If you don't like the feature, then
> ignore it. It's not doing any harm.
Some more clarifications please:
Date: Tue, 09 Apr 2013 08:32:19 -0600
Message-ID: <51642673.9040005_at_gmail.com>
On 09/04/2013 8:08 AM, Jeff Smith wrote:
> I guess that's where we disagree. If you don't like the feature, then
> ignore it. It's not doing any harm.
Some more clarifications please:
Is this only for the currently active connection(s)? Or for ALL configured connections?
- If the latter, what happens to a DBA or Developer responsible for 50+ connections? (it does happen: SYS + SYSTEM + App + user + admin * 10 instances ...) Is it staggered? Is it smart enough to ignore multiple requests to same target?
Is it only once per session, or periodically repeated? - if repeated, what interval?
Need clarification because in some customer/contractor environments that encourage BYOD, I may be trying to access non-local systems, inadvertently violating customer policy.
/Hans
-- http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-lReceived on Tue Apr 09 2013 - 16:32:19 CEST