Re: Unwanted SQL Developer inverse connection storming
From: Jeff Smith <jeff.d.smith_at_oracle.com>
Date: Tue, 09 Apr 2013 10:08:12 -0400
Message-ID: <516420CC.3010103_at_oracle.com>
I guess that's where we disagree. If you don't like the feature, then ignore it. It's not doing any harm. If you can demonstrate harm, then we can discuss changing the feature up or adding a preference to disable it.
Date: Tue, 09 Apr 2013 10:08:12 -0400
Message-ID: <516420CC.3010103_at_oracle.com>
I guess that's where we disagree. If you don't like the feature, then ignore it. It's not doing any harm. If you can demonstrate harm, then we can discuss changing the feature up or adding a preference to disable it.
You can also open a request at our Exchange sqldeveloper.oracle.com
Thanks,
Jeff
On 4/9/2013 10:02 AM, Andrew Kerber wrote:
> The thing is, nobody is going to really care how far away the database
> is. For one, they already know that.
-- http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-lReceived on Tue Apr 09 2013 - 16:08:12 CEST