Re: Named User License Question
From: Hans Forbrich <fuzzy.graybeard_at_gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 06 Feb 2013 06:57:12 -0700
Message-ID: <51126138.5090001_at_gmail.com>
Thanks both Peter and Niall.
This is a perfect example of "Need to talk with Oracle Sales - and get it in writing" as I have seen situations where customers have been charged minimums based on CPU socket for Standard Edition.
Date: Wed, 06 Feb 2013 06:57:12 -0700
Message-ID: <51126138.5090001_at_gmail.com>
Thanks both Peter and Niall.
This is a perfect example of "Need to talk with Oracle Sales - and get it in writing" as I have seen situations where customers have been charged minimums based on CPU socket for Standard Edition.
I wonder whether the difference is in 'regional misinterpretation'.
In any case, I shall be going back to my colleagues in Oracle to get a fresh clarification as I will soon be needing a documented answer myself. /Hans
On 06/02/2013 2:40 AM, Niall Litchfield wrote:
> Correct - the Software Investment Guide does state this, but the
> clearest description I've found is on the Database Licensing
> Guidelines on the shop.oracle.com <http://shop.oracle.com> site (//I
> think that
> https://shop.oracle.com/pls/ostore/f?p=dstore:1001:1718600395065601::::P1001_HELP_ID,P1001_HELP_CATEGORY_ID:3434703196481608942624,3434642144441608865424#3434703196481608942624
> will get you there)
>
>
-- http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-lReceived on Wed Feb 06 2013 - 14:57:12 CET