Re: Limited update ability?
From: rjamya <rjamya_at_gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2012 13:08:24 -0400
Message-ID: <CAGurbTNqPRaGS-1_=QaGSMyO7QYr=3RdTsq3=sN+uUb-5AYzkQ_at_mail.gmail.com>
True, he best protection is to deny access. If that is not possible, provide as little access as possible using application rather than various developer gui interfaces.
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 9:44 AM, <Joel.Patterson_at_crowley.com> wrote:
Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2012 13:08:24 -0400
Message-ID: <CAGurbTNqPRaGS-1_=QaGSMyO7QYr=3RdTsq3=sN+uUb-5AYzkQ_at_mail.gmail.com>
True, he best protection is to deny access. If that is not possible, provide as little access as possible using application rather than various developer gui interfaces.
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 9:44 AM, <Joel.Patterson_at_crowley.com> wrote:
> FGA wouldn't prevent accidents, and I don't believe you could prevent the
> accidents with resource manager either. Anyway, it doesn't hurt to ask
> 'cause one might presume erroneously.
>
-- http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-lReceived on Thu Apr 19 2012 - 12:08:24 CDT