Re: OMS and Repository Preferences
From: Niall Litchfield <niall.litchfield_at_gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2012 12:35:04 +0100
Message-ID: <CABe10sbRSsqqYZhoikEXVXs4rteC4ccf5Ahc3-ZA8BS26Js0SQ_at_mail.gmail.com>
I've never understood why the db docs had the license terms for OEM in them anyway; it is after all a separate product. *note to self: must not rant about management pack licenses here"
Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2012 12:35:04 +0100
Message-ID: <CABe10sbRSsqqYZhoikEXVXs4rteC4ccf5Ahc3-ZA8BS26Js0SQ_at_mail.gmail.com>
I've never understood why the db docs had the license terms for OEM in them anyway; it is after all a separate product. *note to self: must not rant about management pack licenses here"
Niall
On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 9:40 PM, Hans Forbrich <fuzzy.graybeard_at_gmail.com>wrote:
> Excellent.
> Now we have yet another licensing doc with a slightly different
> wording. I explicitly referenced the database 11gR2 license doc.
>
>
-- Niall Litchfield Oracle DBA http://www.orawin.info -- http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-lReceived on Sat Apr 14 2012 - 06:35:04 CDT