RE: OMS and Repository Preferences
Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2012 13:06:51 -0700
Message-ID: <D29F9902E534D5478F2E83FD6A44B30649BF83CCEB_at_mail02.mba.xifin.com>
From my understanding, there is no license needed to for database supporting Oracle Infrastructure.
Hence, OEM repository database (no license needed) and it would makes sense to include primary and standby should DG be leveraged.
I am not going to touch RAC part because I am clueless there.
Michael Dinh
Disparity Breaks Automation (DBA)
Confidence comes not from always being right but from not fearing to be wrong - Peter T Mcintyre Great minds discuss ideas; average minds discuss events; small minds discuss people - Eleanor Roosevelt When any rule or formula becomes a substitute for thought rather than an aid to thinking, it is dangerous and should be discarded -Thomas William Phelps
-----Original Message-----
From: oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org [mailto:oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org] On Behalf Of Tim Hall
Sent: Friday, April 13, 2012 12:46 PM
To: Hans Forbrich
Cc: oracle-l_at_freelists.org
Subject: Re: OMS and Repository Preferences
OK. To revise my statement...
It is my understanding that DG is only allowed as an option on a fully
licensed EE database. If you want the OMR protected using DG you have
to pay full whack for the EE licenses.
I would be very happy to be proved wrong. :)
Of course, as with any Oracle licensing issue, the only way to be sure it to get about 16 independent quotes and compare them, factoring in the over-licensing suggested by the sales people in an attempt to get the new Porsche a bit quicker. :)
Cheers
Tim...
--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Received on Fri Apr 13 2012 - 15:06:51 CDT