Re: MOS - site changing again
From: Jared Still <jkstill_at_gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2011 09:39:07 -0800
Message-ID: <CAORjz=Oh6ZTq4ef=FXNDm2kQfg++i+u+N9dtjtSXRT=dOOaBQg_at_mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 9:31 AM, Wayne Smith <wts_at_maine.edu> wrote:
> If the same people designed the new system, I don't see how the coders can
> turn it into a system we will respect, let alone like.
>
>
In all seriousness, I don't see how the folks responsible for MOS would have the same opportunity with a new system, not at Oracle.
Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2011 09:39:07 -0800
Message-ID: <CAORjz=Oh6ZTq4ef=FXNDm2kQfg++i+u+N9dtjtSXRT=dOOaBQg_at_mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 9:31 AM, Wayne Smith <wts_at_maine.edu> wrote:
> If the same people designed the new system, I don't see how the coders can
> turn it into a system we will respect, let alone like.
>
>
In all seriousness, I don't see how the folks responsible for MOS would have the same opportunity with a new system, not at Oracle.
-- http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-lReceived on Fri Dec 23 2011 - 11:39:07 CST