Re: RAID5

From: Guillermo Alan Bort <cicciuxdba_at_gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2011 17:36:59 -0300
Message-ID: <CAJ2dSGRdkFGJBvrxY+T_i_Tcjr2n+HkbAVTL+nQBrBS-18TwwQ_at_mail.gmail.com>

If you have the ability, I'd say do a benchmark. we've been denied the request for RAID 10 and we got RAID 5 for the databases... it works but we couldn't compare it with RAID 10.

hth
Alan.-

On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 4:32 PM, Tim Gorman <tim_at_evdbt.com> wrote:

> Are vendors just saying that to break down barriers? Or have there really
> been improvements?
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Patrice sur GMail [mailto:patrice.boivin_at_gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 15, 2011 12:27 PM
> To: 'ORACLE-L'
> Subject: RAID5
>
> Stirring the pot a bit maybe...Given improvements in recent years, is RAID
> 10 still relevant inhigh-traffic environments?-- Patrice[image: Facebook]
> [image:LinkedIn] [image:Twitter] [image:Amazon][image:Digg]
> [image:Google] Get a signature like this.CLICKHERE.--
> http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
>
> --
> http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
>
>
>

--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l

Received on Tue Nov 15 2011 - 14:36:59 CST