RE: Re: Oracle XE Corruption
From: Michael McMullen <ganstadba_at_hotmail.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2010 15:18:54 -0400
Message-ID: <SNT130-ds6ECC5E452116047B9C86CA6830_at_phx.gbl>
It took .32 seconds on my xe db. I would "grip it and rip it" during off peak times, worse case scenario, it would take very little time to rebuild an xe db from scratch.
Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2010 15:18:54 -0400
Message-ID: <SNT130-ds6ECC5E452116047B9C86CA6830_at_phx.gbl>
It took .32 seconds on my xe db. I would "grip it and rip it" during off peak times, worse case scenario, it would take very little time to rebuild an xe db from scratch.
-----Original Message-----
From: oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org [mailto:oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org]
On Behalf Of Daniel Fink
Sent: Tuesday, August 24, 2010 3:11 PM
To: Oracle-L_at_FreeLists.org
Subject: RE: Re: Oracle XE Corruption
"Probably less time than it takes to replace the differential in my car.
:)"
Would that be on race day or between races?
smon_scn_time table is the table that Oracle uses to keep track of the relationship between scns and timestamps for flashback operations. It
-- http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-lReceived on Tue Aug 24 2010 - 14:18:54 CDT