Re: MOS down again

From: Gints Plivna <gints.plivna_at_gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 5 Feb 2010 11:44:01 +0200
Message-ID: <6e49b6d01002050144x618b722clcac7c7b9b5961a64_at_mail.gmail.com>



BTW in the background of MOS down, MOS down this article http://www.informationweek.com/news/global-cio/security/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=222002898&cid=nl_IW_btl_2010-01-05_t is veeeery ineteresting. It shows that Oracle's revenue for maintenance is $3.247 billion but expenses only $264 million, so the income percentage is fantastic.
So probably therefore MOS operation also is fantastic? :)

Of course the question remains how revenue and expenses (especially for maintenance) are counted and attributed.

Gints Plivna
http://www.gplivna.eu

2010/2/5 Niall Litchfield <niall.litchfield_at_gmail.com>:
> So it looks like it got picked up when the US woke up. Chris Warticki
> updated his blog with an acknowledgement of the problem and a suggestion
> that when MOS is down then go hunt through community content.
> http://blogs.oracle.com/Support/2010/02/if_mos_is_down_then_what.html I like
> the acknowledgement. I'm not really sure that I like the idea that if MOS is
> down we should go hunt for community delivered content. He doesn't deal with
> the patch issue at all. I also don't like the apparent reliance on a US
> timezone for support availability.
>
> Niall

--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Received on Fri Feb 05 2010 - 03:44:01 CST

Original text of this message