Re: 11g 64 bit and Red Hat 4

thanks, like I said, I've been trying to ignore it, so I did not recognise the reference.

On Fri, Aug 07, 2009 at 10:47:09AM -0500, Don Seiler wrote:
> I believe Greg meant OEL5-U3. OEL3 would be painful.
>
> Don.
>
> On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 10:43 AM, Ray Stell<stellr_at_cns.vt.edu> wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 07, 2009 at 07:51:08AM -0700, Greg Rahn wrote:
> >> RH5/OEL5 certainly works and I would recommend it over RH4. ?I'm using OELU3.
> >
> > OEL3 with which db?
> >
> > I'd been trying to ignore the Oracle linux effort, just because we have
> > such large RH base. ?Probably can't get away with that much longer, heh?
> > Curious, does 11g choke on OEL4? ?When I say choke, I mean do you have
> > to jump through hoops to make it go together.
> >
> > Thanks.
> > --
> > http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Don Seiler
> http://seilerwerks.wordpress.com
> ultimate: http://www.mufc.us

--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l