Re: 32K block size tablespace for indexes

From: hrishy <hrishys_at_yahoo.co.uk>
Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 08:35:55 +0000 (GMT)
Message-ID: <629041.36689.qm_at_web27408.mail.ukl.yahoo.com>



Hi Niall

Thanks for the reply after going through the thread its sounds like the pereceived benfit by moving to a large block size must be thoroughly tested its no gaurantee that performance will improve.

I was wundering why did oracle come out with multiple block size feature considering that in my whole carrer as a DBA i have used large block size only for BLOB column storage and nothing else.

Is exadata the reason for large blocksize ?

regards
Hrishy       

--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Received on Thu Jan 29 2009 - 02:35:55 CST

Original text of this message