Re: shared storage solution

From: Martin Berger <martin.a.berger_at_gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 21:51:32 +0100
Message-Id: <DC297D9F-2172-4428-B791-9605D6FDBFD4@gmail.com>


RAC and CHEAP create a great collision!
If you use RAC either for HA or for scaling, you are in regions where CHEAP will not fit.
So why not save the (little) money for a non-RAC, but rock solid solution?

What's your goal behind the idea?

(I don't want to offend you, I just have to fight the 'cheak' ideas of my management too often)

regards,
  Martin

--
Martin Berger                                     http://berx.at/


>
> I am planning a cheap RAC solution based on Red hat Enterprise 4
> Linux (or oracle unbreakable Linux) .
>
> I get some hints from Jeff Hunter's storage solution, but i am not
> sure if it a stable one, and also the performance?
>
> Do anyone else implement such kind of "cheap" RAC setup with a very
> nice storage solution?
> What is your concern while you choose it ?

-- http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l

  • application/pkcs7-signature attachment: smime.p7s
Received on Tue Oct 28 2008 - 15:51:32 CDT

Original text of this message