Fwd: RE: Listener under ASM or db?

From: Tim Gorman <tim_at_evdbt.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2008 09:36:32 -0600
Message-ID: <20080918093632.i818b5qhwk44g8k8@webmail.evdbt.com>


Taking a TNS Listener down does not "break" existing database connections -- it only means new connection requests from clients get no response.

So, before patching/upgrading /lsnr, "move" the listener to the ORACLE_HOME with the highest version temporarily, then patch/upgrade /lsnr. Outage is very very brief (i.e. /lsnr/bin/lsnrctl stop, /db_2/bin/lsnrctl start). Once upgrade of /lsnr is complete (and it is only the "relink" phase that really matters), then "move" the listener back to /lsnr (i.e. /db_2/bin/lsnrctl stop, /lsnr/bin/lsnrctl start)...

Quoting Herring Dave - dherri <Dave.Herring_at_acxiom.com>:

> Good points, but now I?m even more confused. Let?s say I?ve got
> /asm, /db_1, and /db_2 homes and then place the listener in it?s own
> home /lnsr. Now I want to patch or upgrade /db_2. If I want to
> keep the listener at the highest release, then I?d want to
> patch/upgrade /lnsr. But, to do that I?d have to take the listener
> down, which would break all communication with ASM, which would in
> effect bring both databases down.
>
>
>
> What am I missing or have an incorrect understanding of?
>
>
>
> Dave

  • End forwarded message -----
--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Received on Thu Sep 18 2008 - 10:36:32 CDT

Original text of this message