RE: Multiple listeners (9i/10g) on Windows

From: M Rafiq <>
Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2008 12:10:33 -0400
Message-ID: <BAY107-W10FF2DBAD6007AF52E79A3A1F70@phx.gbl>

Both the listener can be run without any issues. However 10g instance/database must use 10g listener as it will not work with 9i listener. The better way to move 9i instances to 10g listener as well.  

> Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2008 09:46:34 -0500> From:> To:> CC:> Subject: Re: Multiple listeners (9i/10g) on Windows> > Tony,> > I don't think you'll have name clashes. The 10g database on Windows here > prefixes the service name with the Oracle Home Name. So, the 10g > listener service name is "OraHome1TNSListener" and that shouldn't clash > with the 9i service name. I can't remember if 9i prefixed the listener > service name with the Oracle Home name or not--don't have one of those > to verify right now. Regardless, I'd still recommend using a different > listener name just to avoid confusion about which LISTENER you're > working with.> > I don't think there's any risk either since if you do "lsnrctl start > LIST10G" and the service is already there and started, you won't be able > to start it again. If the service doesn't exist, the service will be > created and started.> > Dan> > Tony Sequeira wrote:> > Thanks Dan,> >> > Thanks for your comments.> >> > If I do decide to use the 10g listener for both instances, won't there> > will be a service name clash, unless of course I use a different> > listener name? I would have to remove the 9i service prior to creating> > the 10g service, am I wrong here?> >> > > -->> >

Going green? See the top 12 foods to eat organic.
Received on Thu Apr 03 2008 - 11:10:33 CDT

Original text of this message