RE: how many listeners to run?

That old 69725.1 article does look nice, but still states that it applies only to Oracle7 through Oracle8!

Paul Baumgartel
CREDIT SUISSE
Information Technology
Securities Processing Databases Americas One Madison Avenue
New York, NY 10010
USA
Phone 212.538.1143
paul.baumgartel_at_credit-suisse.com
www.credit-suisse.com

-----Original Message-----
From: oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org
[mailto:oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org] On Behalf Of Rich Jesse Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2008 2:03 PM To: oracle-l
Subject: Re: how many listeners to run?

Metalink note 149628.1, although slightly dated, suggests that the version
of the Listener should match it's hosted databases. It would then make sense to have one Listener per DB in order to be able to segregate them for
upgrading, patching, etc.

On a side note, while trying to find that Metalink note, I see that the very
old 69725.1 article has a new jazzy look. I like!

Rich

> why do you require a listener per instance?
>
> On 10/01/2008, Andrew Kerber <andrew.kerber_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> One listener per instance is what I use.
>>
>> On Jan 10, 2008 10:52 AM, Li Li <litanli_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> > Hi, List,
>> >
>> > I'd like to hear your input on how many listeners to run in a RAC
>> > environment that will host 4 RAC databases. It'll be Oracle
10.2.0.3
>> > on RHEL 4 (all 64-bit). I am leaning to run just 1 listener, what
is
>> > your thoughts on this?

--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l




==============================================================================
Please access the attached hyperlink for an important electronic communications disclaimer: 

http://www.credit-suisse.com/legal/en/disclaimer_email_ib.html
==============================================================================

--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l