Re: ZFS & Oracle

To be fair to SUN, my experience is that anytime *anyone* thinks "gee there's a cool idea lets go XXXX" performance drops through the floor. Sooner or later one gets it back again. I think I stopped suggesting new versions of Oracle for precisely this reason around about 9.0.1/9.0.3. :(

Niall

On 9/24/07, Connor McDonald <mcdonald.connor_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>
> One of the servers here is running Oracle, and the sys admins (keen as
> they
> are) thought "Gee, there's a cool idea...lets go ZFS"...at which point
> performance has dropped through the floor.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org [mailto:oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org]
> On Behalf Of Joe Frohne
> Sent: Thursday, 20 September 2007 11:08 PM
> To: oracle-l_at_freelists.org
> Subject: ZFS & Oracle
>
> Hello,
>
> I searched the archives for general ZFS information and found a few
> threads
> about ZFS and snapshots. These threads are about a year old. I am
> wondering if there is any general impression of running Oracle 10.2.xunder
> ZFS today. Are people doing it successfully? What are the good, the bad
> and the ugly of running Oracle under ZFS?
>
> Regards,
>
> Joe Frohne
>
> --
> http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
>
>
> --
> http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
>
>
>

-- 
Niall Litchfield
Oracle DBA
http://www.orawin.info

--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l