Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> Re: Monitor contention

Re: Monitor contention

From: Ethan Post <post.ethan_at_gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 12:26:57 -0500
Message-ID: <357b48a90705151026m4958a260u9fd597a2dc06bef9@mail.gmail.com>


This is a case of me being as clear as mud. I mean we set a flag in the application that turn off inserts to the logging table.

On 5/15/07, Greg Rahn <greg_at_structureddata.org> wrote:
>
> I think this may be a case of correlation without causation. Changing
> an index from logging to nologging would have no affect on conventional
> inserts.
>
> To quote the documentation:
>
> http://download-west.oracle.com/docs/cd/B19306_01/server.102/b14231/tables.htm#sthref2199
> <quote>
> The NOLOGGING clause also specifies that subsequent direct loads using
> SQL*Loader and direct load INSERT operations are not logged. Subsequent
> DML statements (UPDATE, DELETE, and conventional path insert) are
> unaffected by the NOLOGGING attribute of the table and generate redo.
> </quote>
>
> Regards,
>
> Greg Rahn
> http://structureddata.org
>
>

--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Received on Tue May 15 2007 - 12:26:57 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US