Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> Re: [SPAM] RE: Is it really necessary to reduce ITL Waits to near zero?

Re: [SPAM] RE: Is it really necessary to reduce ITL Waits to near zero?

From: Anjo Kolk <anjo.kolk_at_oraperf.com>
Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 01:21:12 +0200
Message-ID: <54973d5e0705091621t483d80ebo3ebd9e10078edd98@mail.gmail.com>


Has been at the heart of YAPP since 1996, but then again that is over almost 12 years old now :)

On 5/9/07, Bobak, Mark <Mark.Bobak_at_il.proquest.com> wrote:
>
> Hi David,
>
> I actually did read most of your last post, and I was going to reply.
> But, I got pulled into a meeting and sidetracked, etc....
>
> Anyhow, to address your much simplified question: No, if ITL waits (or
> any kind of wait or contention) does not contribute to response time, don't
> waste your time. This is at the heart of Method R, which Cary describes in
> his book, and Amdahl's Law, which you can read about here:
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amdahls_law
>
> Simple conclusion is that if it doesn't affect user response time, why do
> you care?
>
> -Mark
>
> *--*
> *Mark J. Bobak*
> *Senior Oracle Architect*
> *ProQuest/CSA*
>
> "There are 10 types of people in the world: Those who understand binary,
> and those who don't."
>
>
> ------------------------------
> *From:* oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org [mailto:
> oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org] *On Behalf Of *Taft, David
> *Sent:* Wednesday, May 09, 2007 3:44 PM
> *To:* 'oracle-l_at_freelists.org'
> *Subject:* [SPAM] RE: Is it really necessary to reduce ITL Waits to near
> zero?
> *Importance:* Low
>
>
> <the sound of crickets in the background> Yea, silence is pretty much
> what I got from my co-workers on this same subject. I probably provided
> too much info. Believe me, I do understand, however please let me
> ask this question:
>
> If ITL Waits are not a significant contributor to response time nor
> causing deadlocks, can you think of a circumstance that justifies reducing
> ITL waits on an object? Must be my analness, but I keep feeling like I've
> overlooked something.
>
> Thanks,
>
> David Taft
>
> *From:* Taft, David
>
> My main concern is if this analysis is sound. I think it is, but would
> appreciate a second opinion ...
>
>

-- 
Anjo Kolk
Owner and Founder OraPerf Projects
tel:    +31-577-712000
mob: +31-6-55340888

--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Received on Wed May 09 2007 - 18:21:12 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US