Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> RE: formula for # of redo groups

RE: formula for # of redo groups

From: Ric Van Dyke <ric.van.dyke_at_hotsos.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2006 14:15:37 -0500
Message-ID: <C970F08BBE1E164AA8063E01502A71CF72496F@WIN02.hotsos.com>


I've never seen a formula for this, and I've seen all kinds of configurations. I will say that a 2 by 2 is a bit small, especially for archiving. It's best to have some distance between LGWR and ARCH. Having more then 3 groups is generally considered goodness. Having at least 3 members is also considered goodness since this gives a backup of the backup so to say.

Ric Van Dyke
Hotsos Enterprises



Hotsos Symposium March 4-8, 2007. Be there.

-----Original Message-----

From: oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org
[mailto:oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org] On Behalf Of Doug Gernaat Sent: Wednesday, October 11, 2006 1:50 PM To: oracle-l_at_freelists.org
Subject: formula for # of redo groups

is there a tried and true formula for deciding on the number or redo groups and members? is the decision solely based on LGWR activity? what about archiving? for example... a database with 2 groups and 2 members in each group that switches about 10 times a day producing 10 archive files. what is optimal in a relative world?

thanks
-doug-
--

http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l

--

http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l Received on Wed Oct 11 2006 - 14:15:37 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US