Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> RE: Cloning Oracle versus Installing from OUI

RE: Cloning Oracle versus Installing from OUI

From: Kevin Closson <kevinc_at_polyserve.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 09:06:36 -0700
Message-ID: <5D2570CAFC98974F9B6A759D1C74BAD0E5B227@ex2.ms.polyserve.com>

 >>>When companies come to us for database automation, 

>>>provisioning automation is one of the biggest requests,
>>>because organizations are tired of the back-and-forth
>>>between systems and DBA teams, not to
>>>mention the complexities of standardizing the provisioning
>>>process. In

BTW, operationally, this is exactly why a lot of sophisticated, large shops are abstaining from ASM due to the black-box it poses to storage admins. Yes, I know the storage admins ***could*** connect to a server where there is an instance running and get their environment set and run asmcmd to see space used, but storage admins provision space and connectivity to many varying applications and the very thought of connecting to an application (if it is up) to get space available information is just bizarre to many. Monitoring application space availability the way it has been done for decades seems to be a habit hard to shake. The filesystem is running low, add space to the underlying volume and let the filesystem grow. Quick peek, quick action, standardized action/reaction for all apps. Makes sense. Life is an unending series of choices.

--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Received on Fri Sep 29 2006 - 11:06:36 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US