Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> RE: Some Dataguard is good, lots more must be better?

RE: Some Dataguard is good, lots more must be better?

From: Kevin Closson <kevinc_at_polyserve.com>
Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2006 20:48:03 -0700
Message-ID: <5D2570CAFC98974F9B6A759D1C74BAD0E5B063@ex2.ms.polyserve.com> 



 


        It's not only the writes (can you do that synchronously for many
databases, and I mean REALLY synchronously?)


        What I like very much in DG is the DELAY feature. Having a
database running 4-8 hours behind appears to be very useful for logical
failures.



...yes!


--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l


Received on Sun Sep 17 2006 - 22:48:03 CDT












Original text of this message













  HOME |
  ASK QUESTION |
  ADD INFO |
  SEARCH |
  E-MAIL US