Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> RE: Some Dataguard is good, lots more must be better?

RE: Some Dataguard is good, lots more must be better?

From: Allen, Brandon <Brandon.Allen_at_OneNeck.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2006 09:53:04 -0700
Message-ID: <04DDF147ED3A0D42B48A48A18D574C45059E1F4E@NT15.oneneck.corp>


Wow, I didn't know that - when did they change it? The last time I checked I think the docs said that you didn't have to license the standby as long as you didn't use it more than 10 days per year. I just looked it up though and it appears you are correct - according to page 21 of the Software Investment Guide, the standby must be fully licensed:  

http://www.oracle.com/corporate/pricing/sig.pdf    


        From: oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org
[mailto:oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org] On Behalf Of Connor McDonald                  

        My only gripe with DG, is the license fee....no more of that nice "if you only use some of the time" stuff anymore - it gets licensed as if it was a fully fledged always-on database...

Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message or attachments hereto. Please advise immediately if you or your employer do not consent to Internet email for messages of this kind. Opinions, conclusions and other information in this message that do not relate to the official business of this company shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by it.

--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Received on Tue Sep 19 2006 - 11:53:04 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US