Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> RE: two databases in a server

RE: two databases in a server

From: Jesse, Rich <Rich.Jesse_at_qg.com>
Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2006 14:37:50 -0600
Message-ID: <FB5D3CCFCECC2948B5DCF4CABDBE6697546038@QTEX1.qg.com>


"DASD"? Ouch. Think "SAN". More spindles, more bandwidth, less waste.  

Rich

	-----Original Message-----
	From: oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org
[mailto:oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org] On Behalf Of Thomas Day
	Sent: Friday, March 31, 2006 2:30 PM
	To: Michael Fontana
	Cc: oracle-l_at_freelists.org
	Subject: Re: two databases in a server
	
	
	Well, in fact, I usually am that guy.  I buy a an Intel box with
the largest RAM that it will support and the biggest hard drive that the budget will allow.          

        When the box is maxed out (either on RAM or DASD) I just start saying, "No" until someone says, "I have budget for a new server."          

        The production is business critical. There is no point to the existence of this organization if the production database is not functioning. This may be hard for the bean counters to understand but their existence is pointless if the database is not working.                   

--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Received on Fri Mar 31 2006 - 14:37:50 CST

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US