Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> RE: On AIX using DIO/CIO on JFS2

RE: On AIX using DIO/CIO on JFS2

From: Allen, Brandon <Brandon.Allen_at_OneNeck.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 13:00:35 -0700
Message-ID: <04DDF147ED3A0D42B48A48A18D574C4503D402A2@NT15.oneneck.corp>


Thanks for the info, but I'm not sure how this would cause problems for Oracle. If you're using DIO or CIO, how would you get a "cached write" since dio/cio bypass the cache by definition? Also, if you're working with Oracle blocks of say 8k, and your cio filesystem is created with the default 4k page size, how would you get a non-page-aligned file size?

Did you actually have problems in Oracle due to this bug?

Thanks,
Brandon

-----Original Message-----

From: oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org
[mailto:oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org]On Behalf Of Denny Koovakattu Sent: Friday, February 17, 2006 12:28 PM To: oracle-l_at_freelists.org
Subject: Bug: On AIX using DIO/CIO on JFS2

FYI: The following was released by IBM today and was classified as a HIPER (High Impact/Highly Pervasive).

APAR Number: IY78323
A cached write to a JFS2 file resulting in a non-page-aligned file size followed by a subsequent DIO/CIO write to the last block of the file results in no size increase, losing part of the last write. This only occurs on JFS2.

Regards,
Denny
--

Denny Koovakattu



This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.

--

http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l

Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message or attachments hereto. Please advise immediately if you or your employer do not consent to Internet email for messages of this kind. Opinions, conclusions and other information in this message that do not relate to the official business of this company shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by it.

--

http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l Received on Fri Feb 17 2006 - 14:00:35 CST

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US