Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> Re: Cluster file systems versus raw devices in Oracle RAC

Re: Cluster file systems versus raw devices in Oracle RAC

From: Maimon Oded <oded.maimon_at_gmail.com>
Date: 2005-12-29 10:15:39
Message-id: afc75c420512290115r10dbd5fem843285e290f71c7@mail.gmail.com


i know some companies that have RAC in site license. but let's change the discussion to something else.

NFS of CFS?

On 12/29/05, Kevin Closson wrote:

> sometimes man bites dog
>
> :-)
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
> *From:* oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org [mailto:
> oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org] *On Behalf Of *rjamya
> *Sent:* Wednesday, December 28, 2005 6:40 PM
> *To:* tanel.poder.003_at_mail.ee
> *Cc:* ORACLE-L
> *Subject:* Re: Cluster file systems versus raw devices in Oracle RAC
>
>
> We are licensed for all rdbms products/options. We can use them whenever
> ... so that helps.
>
> Rjamya
>
> On 12/28/05, Tanel Põder < tanel.poder.003_at_mail.ee> wrote:
> >
> >
> > Kevin is right, as much as I've seen none of the site licenses have had
> > RAC
> > included, most of my customers have even had to pay for partitioning
> > extra
> > (although discounted) price.
> >
> >
>
Received on Thu Dec 29 2005 - 10:15:39 CST

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US