Re: remote server for log_archive_dest

Mladen is right. I should have said log_archive_dest_n, but figured that was clear by talking about 'secondary log_archive_dest'. I actually should have written 'secondary log archive destionation'.

And yes, log_archive_dest still exists.

Regards, Carel-Jan

===
If you think education is expensive, try ignorance. (Derek Bok) ===

> I think it is still a valid parameter in 10g:
>
> INSTANCE_NAME HOST_NAME VERSION STARTUP_TIME
> STATUS
> DATABASE_STATUS
> ---------------- --------------- ----------------- ------------------
> ------------ -----------------
> XYZ XYZ 10.1.0.2.0 23-AUG-05
> 23:25:52 OPEN ACTIVE
>
>
> SQL> show parameter log_archive_dest
>
> NAME TYPE VALUE
> ------------------------------------ -----------
> ------------------------------
> log_archive_dest string
> E:\oracle\product\10.1.0\admin
> \SATQ\arch
>
> Regards
> Rafiq
>
>
>
> From: Mladen Gogala <gogala_at_sbcglobal.net>
> Reply-To: gogala_at_sbcglobal.net
> To: cjpengel.dbalert_at_xs4all.nl
> CC: peterdixon001_at_hotmail.com, oracle-l_at_freelists.org
> Subject: Re: remote server for log_archive_dest
> Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2005 14:39:29 +0000
>
>
> On 08/24/2005 09:51:02 AM, Carel-Jan Engel wrote:
> > You can mount an exported directory on the destination server through
> NFS,
>
> Or, to disgust everybody on this list, share the destination directory
> from
> a Win2k server and mount the share with smbmount.
>
> > and have a secondary log_archive_dest pointing to that (virtually
> local)
> > location.
>
> That would be log_archive_dest_1. The log_archive_dest parameter is
> obsolete
> and
> shouldn't be used.
>
> >
> > Regards, Carel-Jan
> >
>
> I'm at home, on antibiotics, I lost my voice and now I am nitpicking and
> suggesting
> Winduhs instead of the good, old NFS3.
> Regards,
> --
> Mladen Gogala
> http://www.mgogala.com
>
>
> --
> http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
>
>
>

--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l