Re: Consistent gets -- question

Sat,

AFAIK .. The Current and Query are Blocks and i am not sure you can equate that rows untl u know how the rows are packed. Also See the Prev post which talks abt direct inserts.

Cheers
Ganesh

On Tue, 01 Feb 2005 13:17:45 -0800, sat0789_at_fastmail.fm <sat0789_at_fastmail.fm> wrote:
> Hello All,
> I have a situation....
> We are running an etl process into a fact table has 15 fk's enabled (no
> indexes associated) During the session's run i did a trace session and
> this is the result from tkprof
>
> Execute 1175 23.09 23.22 10(disk) 3616(query)
> 1092396(current) 56400 (rows)
>
> As you can see there is a huge amount of current gets for 56400 rows.
>
> Now i removed all the constraints and ran the session again. this is the
> result..
>
> Execute 3520 29.60 29.02 0 6796(query)
> 14530 (current) 168960 (rows)
>
> The result shows very minimal current gets for a lot more rows than
> previous one.
>
> For some reason i am under the immpression that the current gets should
> at least match the number of rows inserted (or it is only for
> update/delete ??)
> The 2nd result disproves that..
> Please help me understand...
>
> Also i had seen in one of the metalink replies by the oracle tech that
>
> """the number of 'query' divided by the number of rows comes
> out to about 9 gets/row, which is not unreasonable. The number
> of 'current' divided by the number of rows is quite a bit higher
> at 33 gets/row, but may not be unreasonable,""""
>
> What is a resonable/unreasonale number for query get/row and current
> get/row
>
> Thanks,
>
> Sat
> --
> http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
>

--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l