Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> RE: [OT] HOWTO's of messing up Linux cluster?

RE: [OT] HOWTO's of messing up Linux cluster?

From: Reidy, Ron <Ron.Reidy_at_arraybiopharma.com>
Date: Sat, 20 Nov 2004 16:44:30 -0700
Message-ID: <17CAB0BF27BCFC47B0E4554A0E2F962B562831@fiji.arraybp.com>


Not enough info to even hazard a guess.

I would suggest a level 8 trace is in order.

--
Ron Reidy
Lead DBA
Array BioPharma, Inc.


-----Original Message-----
From:	oracle-l-bounce_at_freelists.org on behalf of Branimir Petrovic
Sent:	Sat 11/20/2004 4:30 PM
To:	'oracle-l_at_freelists.org'
Cc:=09
Subject:	[OT]  HOWTO's of messing up Linux cluster?
Situation:
   Early stages of development project; same small database runs on=20
   development PCs, early build is given to customer for "look and
   feel" and training purposes.

Sad facts:=20
   "PC Vulgaris" (P4 @ 2.8 GHz with _one_ IDE drive running WinXP)=20
   /w Oracle 9.2 db outperforms by factor of FIVE (meaning exact same=20
   batch jobs run at least 5 TIMES FASTER!!!???) two node Oracle 9.2=20
   cluster on Linux (RH AS3). Beats it by huge margin it every single
   time.=20

   Hardware at customer's site is 6 month old (implying relatively=20
   new hardware) 2 P4-Xeon CPUs server forming two node Oracle 9.2=20
   cluster connected to dedicated (this cluster only, dedicated
   to this project only) SAN (with unknown number of drives).=20

Question:
   If you were really incompetent SA/DBA what would be easy ways
   to duplicate the above requirement? (achieve five times=20
   worse performance using much "stronger" hardware)


>From whatever little I know of ways problematic database is set
up and configured, I'd say it is not the Oracle that is messed up,=20 but the underlying OS.=20 Being at arms length from the problem (due to mountains of political=20 bs. - "us" vs. "them"), and quite frankly due to my own shortcomings=20 with Unix/Linux, I am in no position to help in any meaningful way.=20 Still curiosity factor is strong - what could possibly be so wrong with this RAC?=20 Wild guesses - welcomed :-) Branimir -- http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l This electronic message transmission is a PRIVATE communication which = contains information which may be confidential or privileged. The information is = intended=20 to be for the use of the individual or entity named above. If you are = not the=20 intended recipient, please be aware that any disclosure, copying, = distribution=20 or use of the contents of this information is prohibited. Please notify = the sender of the delivery error by replying to this message, or notify us = by telephone (877-633-2436, ext. 0), and then delete it from your system. -- http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Received on Sat Nov 20 2004 - 17:41:38 CST

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US