Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Mailing Lists -> Oracle-L -> RE: Raid5 Vs Raid0+1 -- Raw Vs Solaris 9 Concurrent Direct IO UFS

RE: Raid5 Vs Raid0+1 -- Raw Vs Solaris 9 Concurrent Direct IO UFS

From: Gogala, Mladen <Mladen.Gogala_at_aetn.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2004 09:45:30 -0400
Message-ID: <30462D80AA52E74698512ADCC4F7EAA3122396C6@EXCHANGE>


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Connor McDonald [mailto:hamcdc_at_yahoo.co.uk]
> Sent: Thursday, August 26, 2004 1:05 AM
> To: oracle-l_at_freelists.org
> Subject: RE: Raid5 Vs Raid0+1 -- Raw Vs Solaris 9 Concurrent
> Direct IO UFS
>
>
> I've always bowed to Tom...
>
> So now you're asking me to bowel to Tom
>
> :-)

I don't think it would be prudent for me to make any further explanatory comments in that direction. Allow me to point out that Mogens was at least as bad as me, but a little less transparent. While my "take this RAID-5 and shove it" comment provoked a slew of replies, his comment about nice front end and I/O was not even noticed.

--
Mladen Gogala
A & E TV Network
Ext. 1216
----------------------------------------------------------------
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
----------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe send email to:  oracle-l-request_at_freelists.org
put 'unsubscribe' in the subject line.
--
Archives are at http://www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/
FAQ is at http://www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Received on Thu Aug 26 2004 - 08:41:15 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US