RE: REPLICATION

From: Carel-Jan Engel <cjpengel.dbalert_at_xs4all.nl>
Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 22:02:36 +0200
Message-Id: <6.0.1.1.0.20040630215904.45d54c50@pop.xs4all.nl>

Apologies Steve, I was too short in my phrasing, and should have put some more effort in the right wording.
What I meant is: do not use a LSB database as DR database. Your idea of having two databases for the two purposes is OK. LSB in 9i just isn't stable enough (when running more complexity than a demo schema) to serve as a proper DR-site.

At 10:42 AM 6/30/2004 -0600, you wrote:
>Regarding...=20
> > I wouldn't go for the LSB/DR combination on 9i.=20
>Why not? I was just getting ready to try this exact same thing. (i.e.
>implement a Physical standby and a logical standby.)
>
>
>TIA,
>Steve Orr
>Bozeman, Montana

Regards, Carel-Jan

===
If you think education is expensive, try ignorance. (Derek Bok) ===

---

Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com

---

To unsubscribe send email to: oracle-l-request_at_freelists.org put 'unsubscribe' in the subject line.

--
Archives are at http://www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/
FAQ is at http://www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------

Received on Wed Jun 30 2004 - 14:55:37 CDT